aium communities

Every ultrasound specialty. One professional network.

At my facility we have been required to switch to single dose ultrasound gel packets for infection control reasons. This change was implemented a few months ago and is for our entire hospital for all procedures requiring a gel couplant. We are not thrilled with the change. As many of you probably do, we were refilling gel bottles from a gallon pump jug and happy doing so. Only a few single dose ultrasound gel options are available for the proper amount needed for OB scanning. Some patients would require 2-3 packets. The first one we tried was too thick (like cement) and right away we noticed a difference (increase) in our scanning discomfort. On average we scan 8-10 OB patients a day, many of which are obese. We also would swear that the image quality was compromised. Apparently there are studies out there that have proven that there is no significant difference in image quality among the different ultrasound gels - we disagree….

I did a little research on the subject and will share some info taken from a publication put out by SONOTECH, INC (www.sonotech-inc.com).

• hospital infection control specialists and epidemiologists are identifying a contamination potential in the use of squeeze bottles and the practice of refilling bottles of ultrasound gel
• nosocomial infections are caused by viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens
• the use of ultrasound gel bottles and bottle refilling practices can be a source of nosocomial infections and patient cross-contamination
• warming and re-warming bottles that have cooled to room temperature can incubate bacteria
• bottles and gel contents are exposed to environmental air, patient skin, or body fluids can become contaminated with a wide range of pathogens that can be transmitted to another patient during a subsequent procedure
• use of single packets eliminates the repetitive motion of bottle squeezing and shaking which adds to work-related musculoskeletal disorders in sonography

I am curious how many of you out there have converted to the single dose ultrasound couplant and how is it going? What brand do you use?

Also to the AIUM accreditation department, I am curious as to whether this may soon be a requirement for practice accreditation???

Thanks,

Lisa

Tags: gel, ultrasound

Views: 380

Replies to This Discussion

Lisa,

I always used single-dose gel packets (Sonotech) for neonatal brain exams. At the hospital where I used to work we used non-refillable bottles and threw out the gel warmers. So yes, we used bottles, but we did not refill them or warm the gel. Infection control notwithstanding, I would dread using single dose packets on an exam, especially on OB where we use a lot of gel. Besides the waste, it would add length to the study. I prefer the middle option - non-refillable gel bottles and no warmers - to single-dose packets for everyone or refilling skanky bottles. 

Traci

 

I agree with its importance but this cant be implemented in all departments due to cost.Its seems in future many centres of excellence are going to use disposable transducers followed by single use ultrasound.This idea is going to be favoured by chinese probes and machines in the market which are very cost effective.

really interesting

dr gilani 

Single dose gel is a very nice concept. It will be decades before we people will use here. Specialized centres should use it. Certainly it will be costly.

 

People here even do not like the  use of couplant spread on the bodies. Once my wife , during USG scan , complained  that she does not deserve to be spread with so much of jell because she is my lady.

Thank You, Lisa  Great info, as always from you.

 I just wrote to the company to get some samples.  My concern is cost effectiveness, but we also must prioritize patient safety.

I must admit, squeezing those gell bottles and right handed scanning does take a toll on our hands and arms!

RSS

© 2012   Created by AIUM.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service